The Importance of the Method of Creating a Thesaurus in the Study of Literary Texts
78 82
Keywords:
: literary studies, linguistics, thesaurus, literary text, thesaurus analysis.Abstract
The article examines the scientific methodological foundations of thesaurus
research of literary texts. To this end, the formation of the concept of thesaurus and the meaning of the thesaurus method, the types of thesaurus dictionary and their main function are analyzed. The importance of the thesaurus research method in the study of literary texts is determined. The
research used methods such as systematization, generalization, sorting, and formulation of the
material. The article pays special attention to foreign and domestic thesaurus studies, analyzes the types of thesaurus dictionaries and their features. The article compares the thesaurus and a simple
dictionary, identifies a number of optimal moments and ineffective aspects of the thesaurus. In the
article, the thesaurus is recognized as a special terminological dictionary within a particular subject
area, the meanings of which are close to terms (words and phrases) and semantic relations between them and grouped into concepts. The thesaurus analysis method is also an important research method in modern literary science. The thesaurus research method is widely used in the analysis of literary texts, as it allows you to identify semantic connections between words and understand the meaning of a work, helps to analyze and classify words, create dictionaries and lexical databases. The results achieved in the course of the study can be used in thesaurus research, the construction of a thesaurus based on literary texts.
References
Шайкевич А.Я. Введение в лингвистику. – M.: Академия, 2005. – 400 с.
Караулов Ю.Н. Лингвистическое конструирование и тезаурус литературного языка. – М.: Наука,
– 365 с.
Баранов О.С. Идеографический словарь русского языка. – М.: Издательство ЭТС, 1995. – 820 с.
Добровольский Д.О., Караулов Ю.Н. Идиоматика в тезаурусе языковой личности // Вопросы
языкознания. – 1993. – №2. – С. 5–15.
Шрейдер Ю.А. Об одной модели семантической информации // Проблемы кибернетики. –
– Вып. 13. – С. 41–47.
Воробьев Г.Г. Кибернетика стучится в школу. – М.: Молодая гвардия, 1986. – 156 с.
Tetiana Sych. Scientific thesaurus as an indicator of the development of the theory of education
management and methodology // World Science. – 2018. – №5(33), Vol. 4. – P. 29–33.
Әбдірәсілов Е. Қазақ терминографиясының негіздері. – Астана: Фолиант, 2010. – 325 б. 9. Ниятова Ш.С. Махамбеттің тілдік тұлғасы: филол. ғыл. канд. ... автореф. – Алматы, 2007. – 26 б.
Мамырбекова Г., Сейтбекова А. Әбілғазы баһадүр ханның «Түркі шежіресінің» тезаурус
сөздігі. – Алматы: Фирма Орнак, 2013. – 480 б.
Аймұхамбет Ж.Ә. Aбай поэзиясындағы «мәңгілік бейнені» тезаурустық талдау // Керуен. – 2022.
– №1 (74). – Б. 85–102.
Сарекенова Қ.Қ. Абай Құнанбайұлы шығармалары бойынша тезаурустық талдау // Торайғыров
университетінің Хабаршысы. Филологиялық сериясы. – 2022. – №2. – Б. 222–232.
Шәріпбай А.Ә., Ергеш Б.Ж., Муканова А.С., Зулхажав А. Түркі тілдерінің грамматикасы
тезаурусының құрамы мен құрылымы // Вестник Алматинского университета энергетики и
связи. – 2020. – №3 (50). – Б. 111–117.
Shaikevich A.Ia. Vvedenie v lingvistiku [Introduction to linguistics]. – M.: Akademia, 2005. – 400 s. [in
Russian]
Karaulov Iu.N. Lingvisticheskoe konstruirovanie i tezaurus literaturnogo iazyka [Linguistic construction
and thesaurus of the literary language]. – M.: Nauka, 1981. – 365 s. [in Russian]
Baranov O.S. Ideograficheski slovar russkogo iazyka [Ideographic dictionary of Russian language]. –
M.: Izdatelstvo ETS, 1995. – 820 s. [in Russian]
Dobrovolski D.O., Karaulov Iu.N. Idiomatika v tezauruse iazykovoi lichnosti [Idiomatics in the
thesaurus of linguistic personality] // Voprosy iazykoznania. – 1993. – №2. – S. 5–15. [in Russian]
Shreider Iu.A. Ob odnoi modeli semanticheskoi informacii [About one semantic information model] //
Problemy kibernetiki. – 1965. – Vyp. 13. – S. 41–47. [in Russian]
Vorobiev G.G. Kibernetika stuchitsia v shkolu [Cybernetics comes to the school]. – M.: Molodaia
gvardia, 1986. – 156 s. [in Russian]
Tetiana Sych. Scientific thesaurus as an indicator of the development of the theory of education
management and methodology // World Science. – 2018. – №5(33), Vol. 4. – P. 29–33.
Abdіrasіlov E. Qazaq terminografiasynyn negіzderі [Fundamentals of Kazakh terminology]. – Astana:
Foliant, 2010. – 325 b. [in Kazakh]
Niatova Sh.S. Mahambettіn tіldіk tulgasy [Language personality of Makhambet]: filol. gyl. kand. ...
avtoref. – Almaty, 2007. – 26 b. [in Kazakh]
Mamyrbekova G., Seitbekova A. Abіlgazy baһadur hannyn «Turkі shejіresіnіn» tezaurus sozdіgі
[Thesaurus Dictionary of the “Turkic Chronicle” of Abilgazy Bahadur Khan]. – Almaty: Firma Ornak,
– 480 b. [in Kazakh]
Aimuhambet J.A. Abai poeziasyndagy «mangіlіk beinenі» tezaurustyq taldau [Thesaurus Analysis of
«Eternal Image» in Abay’s Poetry] // Keruen. – 2022. – №1 (74). – B. 85–102. [in Kazakh]
Sarekenova Q.Q. Abai Qunanbaiuly shygarmalary boiynsha tezaurustyq taldau [Thesaurus analysis of
the works of Abay Kunanbayuly] // Toraigyrov universitetіnіn Habarshysy. Filologialyq seriasy. – 2022.
– №2. – B. 222–232. [in Kazakh]
Sharіpbai A.A., Ergesh B.J., Mukanova A.S., Zulhajav A. Turkі tіlderіnіn grammatikasy tezaurusynyn
quramy men qurylymy [Composition and structure of the thesaurus of grammar of Turkic languages] //
Vestnik Almatinskogo universiteta energetiki i sviazi. – 2020. – №3 (50). – B. 111–117. [in Kazakh]
