Actual Problems of Cognitive Linguistics at the Present Stage
184 158
Keywords:
cognitive linguistics, problems of linguistics, scientific field, theory of knowledge, features, interrelationship.Abstract
This article is devoted to the study of the historical and scientific prerequisites for
the formation of a young, developing, and at the same time controversial and controversial scientific branch of linguistics - cognitive linguistics. The goals, object and subject of research in this field of knowledge are determined by theoretical and methodological principles that are formed on the basis of the cognitive-oriented work of Kazakh and foreign linguists. The continuation of the research traditions of cognitive linguistics, which is gaining popularity among Kazakh researchers, is noted. The theoretical and scientific basis of the research are such linguistic areas as frame and conceptual semantics, prototypical semantics, the theory of relevance (or linguistic emphasis), the theory of cognitive models and cognitive metaphor, the theory of mental spaces. Special attention is paid to the problems of the English language in comparison with other
language groups, which creates difficulties in linguists relying on traditional approaches to the study of the language system. The identified specific features in the use of English prepositions, modal verbs, the use of participles, the category of voice, tense, aspect, mood, as well as some difficulties in coordinating tenses lead researchers to the need to use linguo-cognitive methods of cognition. The establishment of a close and complex relationship between language and the process of thinking, cognition is accepted as an evidence-based advantage of the study. The data obtained as a result of the analysis are based on logical, deductive, comparative linguistic research methods. The tools used to assess the current problems of modern cognitive linguistics can be of applied significance and be used in international scientific communities to improve approaches to language learning. The scientific and practical significance of this study lies in the search for possible ways and implementation of identification opportunities, as well as a comprehensive study of the most pressing problems, reflecting the urgent need for further development of this scientific field.
References
Касевич В. Когнитивная лингвистика: В поисках идентичности. – М.: Языки славянской
культуры, 2013. – Litres, 2022. – 192 с.
Оразалиева Э.Н. Когнитивная лингвистика: научная монография. – Алматы: Ан Арыс, 2017. –
б.
Филлмор Ч. Фреймы и семантика понимания // В кн. Новое в зарубежной лигвистике. Вып. 23.
Когнитивные аспекты языка. – М.: Прогресс, 2018. – С. 52–92.
Шахметова Н.А., Самсенова Г.С. Актуальные проблемы языкознания: когнитивная природа
метафоры. – Павлодар: Кереку, 2018. – 158 с.
Rosch E. Cognitive representations of semantic categories // Journal of experimental psychology:
General. – 2005. – Т. 104. – №3. – P. 192–233.
Fillmore C. J., Geeraerts D. Cognitive linguistics: basic readings. – Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. –
p.
Болдырев Н. Н., Виноградова С. Г. Сложное предложение и его метакогнитивное
моделирование // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. – 2016. – №1 – С. 18–36.
Беседина Н.А. Межуровневое взаимодействие в языке как проблема когнитивной лингвистики //
Международный конгресс по когнитивной лингвистике. – 2008. – С. 58–61.
Выготский Л.С. Теория когнитивного развития. – М.: Педагогика-Пресс, 2017. – 480 c.
Котельникова Е.В. Актуализация моделей когнитивной лингвистики в англоязычном научноинновационном дискурсе: дис. .... канд. филол. наук. – М., 2013. – 205 с.
Болдырев Н.Н. Когнитивная семантика. Введение в когнитивную лингвистику. – Тамбов:
Издательский дом ТГУ им. Г.Р. Державина, 2014. – 236 с.
Маслова В.А. Введение в когнитивную лингвистику. 7-е изд. – М.: ФЛИНТА, 2016. – 296 с.
Кубрякова Е.С. Размышления о судьбах когнитивной лингвистики на рубеже веков // Вопросы
филологии. – 2009. – №1 (7). – С. 28–34.
Ерназарова З.Ш. Етістіктің шақ категориясы: семантика-когнитивтік талдау // ҚазҰУ
хабаршысы. Филология сериясы. – 2016. – №2. – Б. 121–125.
Гиздатов Г.Г. Типология и динамика когнитивных моделей в речевой деятельности
(психолингвистический аспект): дис. ... док. филол. наук. – Алматы, 1999. – 293 с.
Попова З.Д., Стернин И.А. Когнитивная лингвистика. – М.: АСТ Восток-Запад, 2017. – 314 с.
Сабитова З.К. Новые лингвистические направления ХХ–XXI вв. // Язык и метод: Русский язык в
лингвистических исследованиях XXI века. – М., 2012. – С. 347–360.
Ахметжанова З.К., Мусатаева М.Ш. Актуальные проблемы лингвокогнитологии и
лингвокультурологии: монография. – Алматы: PrintS, 2013. – 132 с.
Әмірoв Ә.Ж., Құлжaнoвa Р.Б., Дoсaнoв Б.И., Исаева Ж. Тeрминoлoгиялық үрдістeрдің тілдік
фaктoрлaры // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2020. – №4 (118). – Б. 271–282.
Сабитова З.К. Словарь евразийской лингвокультуры Казахстана. – Алматы: Қазақ университеті,
– 187 с.
Жаркынбекова Ш.К. Языковая концептуализация цвета в казахском и русском языках: дис. ...
док. филол. наук. – Алматы, 2004. – 265 с.
Туманова А.Б. Языковая картина мира в художественном дискурсе писателя-билингва: дис. ...
канд. филол. наук. – М., 2008. – 176 с.23. Амалбекова М.Б. Феномен билингвальной личности публициста (лингвокогнитивный и
сопоставительный аспекты): автореф. ... док. филол. наук. – Астана, 2010. – 40 с.
Kasevich V. Kognitivnaia lingvistika: V poiskah identichnosti [Cognitive Linguistic]. – M. Iazyki
slavianskoi kultury, 2013. – Litres, 2022. – 192 s. [in Russian]
Orazalieva E.N. Kognitivnaia lingvistika [Cognitive Linguistic]: nauchnaia monografia. – Almaty: An
Arys, 2017. –312 b. [in Russian]
Fillmor Ch. Freimy i semantika ponimania [Frames and semantics of understanding] // Novoe v
zarubejnoi ligvistike. Vyp. 23. Kognitivnye aspekty iazyka. – M.: Progress, 2018. – S. 52–92. [in
Russian]
Shahmetova N.A., Samsenova G.S. Aktualnye problemy iazykoznania: kognitivnaia priroda metafory
[Current problems of linguistics: the cognitive nature of metaphor]. – Pavlodar: Kereku, 2018. – 158 s.
[in Russian]
Rosch E. Cognitive representations of semantic categories // Journal of experimental psychology:
General. – 2005. – T. 104. – №3. – P. 192–233.
Fillmore C. J., Geeraerts D. Cognitive linguistics: basic readings. – Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. –
p.
Boldyrev N.N., Vinogradova S.G. Slojnoe predlojenie i ego metakognitivnoe modelirovanie [Complex
sentence and its meta-cognitive modeling] // Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. – 2016. – №1. – S. 18–36.
[in Russian]
Besedina N.A. Mejurovnevoe vzaimodeistvie v iazyke kak problema kognitivnoi lingvistiki [Interlevel
interaction in language as a problem of cognitive linguistics] // Mejdunarodnyi kongress po kognitivnoi
lingvistike. – 2008. – S. 58-61. – S. 58–61. [in Russian]
Vygotski L.S. Teoria kognitivnogo razvitia [Theory of cognitive development]. – M.: Pedagogika-Press,
– 480 s. [in Russian]
Kotelnikova E.V. Aktualizacia modelei kognitivnoi lingvistiki v angloiazychnom nauchnoinnovacionnom diskurse [Updating models of cognitive linguistics in English-language scientific and
innovative discourse]: dis. … kand. filol. nauk. – M., 2013. – 205 s. [in Russian]
Boldyrev N.N. Kognitivnaia semantika. Vvedenie v kognitivnuiu lingvistiku [Cognitive semantics.
Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics]. – Tambov: Izdatelski dom TGU im. G.R. Derjavina, 2014. –
s. [in Russian]
Maslova V.A. Vvedenie v kognitivnuiu lingvistiku [Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics]. 7-e izd. –
M.: FLINTA, 2016. – 296 s. [in Russian]
Kubriakova E.S. Razmyshlenia o sudbah kognitivnoi lingvistiki na rubeje vekov [Reflections on the fate
of cognitive linguistics at the turn of the century] // Voprosy filologii. – 2009. – №1 (7). – S. 28–34. [in
Russian]
Ernazarova Z.Sh. Etіstіktіn shaq kategoriasy: semantika-kognitivtіk taldau [Verb tense category:
semantics-cognitive analysis] // QazUU habarshysy. Filologia seriasy. – 2016. – №2. – B. 121–125. [in
Kazakh]
Gizdatov G.G. Tipologia i dinamika kognitivnyh modelei v rechevoi deiatelnosti (psiholingvisticheski
aspekt) [Typology and dynamics of cognitive models in speech activity (psycholinguistic aspect)]: dis.
… dok. filol. nauk. – Almaty, 1999. – 293 s. [in Russian]
Popova Z.D., Sternin I.A. Kognitivnaia lingvistika [Cognitive Linguistic]. – M.: AST Vostok-Zapad,
– 314 s. [in Russian]
Sabitova Z.K. Novye lingvisticheskie napravlenia XX–XXI vv. [New linguistic directions of the XX–
XXI centuries] // Iazyk i metod: Russki iazyk v lingvisticheskih issledovaniah XXI veka. – M., 2012. S.
–360. [in Russian]
Ahmetjanova Z.K., Musataeva M.Sh. Aktualnye problemy lingvokognitologii i lingvokulturologii
[Current problems of linguocognitology and linguoculturology]: monografia. – Almaty: PrintS, 2013. –
s. [in Russian] 19. Amirov A.J., Kuljanova R.B., Dosanov B.I., Isaeva J. Terminologialyq urdіsterdіn tіldіk faktorlary
[Linguistic factors of terminological trends] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2020. – №4 (118). –
B. 271–282. [in Kazakh]
Sabitova Z.K. Slovar evraziskoi lingvokultury Kazahstana [Dictionary of Eurasian linguistic culture of
Kazakhstan]. – Almaty: Qazaq universitetі, 2011. – 187 s. [in Russian]
Jarkynbekova Sh.K. Iazykovaia konceptualizacia cveta v kazahskom i russkom iazykah [Linguistic
conceptualization of color in the Kazakh and Russian languages]: dis. … dok. filol. nauk. – Almaty,
[in Russian]
Tumanova A.B. Iazykovaia kartina mira v hudojestvennom diskurse pisatelia-bilingva The linguistic
picture of the world in the artistic discourse of a bilingual writer]: dis. … kand. filol. nauk. – M., 2008. –
s. [in Russian]
Amalbekova M.B. Fenomen bilingvalnoi lichnosti publicista (lingvokognitivnyi i sopostavitelnyi
aspekty) The phenomenon of a bilingual personality of a publicist (linguocognitive and comparative
aspects)]: avtoref. … dok. filol. nauk. – Astana, 2010. – 40 s. [in Russian]
